Thursday, October 21, 2010

Migrant Mother

The Farm Security Administration- Office of War Information Collection is essentially a collection of photos that is meant to document American life between 1935 and 1944 (http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/fsahtml/fabout.html).  At first, the project was meant to document loans made to farmers by Resettlement Administration as well as the construction of planned suburban communities (http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/fsahtml/fabout.html).  As time passed and the project expanded, the photographs began to record conditions, both urban and rural in nature, throughout the United States as well as mobilization efforts for WWII (http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/fsahtml/fabout.html).

This project had a significant impact on society because of what it captured.  The images of this project show Americans at work, at play, and at home.  It highlights rural and small-town life, and emphasizes some of the adverse affects of the Great Depresssion, the Dust Bowl, and increasing farm mechanization.  (http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/fsahtml/fahome.html). 

The “Migrant Mother” photograph is actually a series of photographs that Dorothea Lange made of Florence Owens Thompson and her children in February or March of 1936 in Nipomo, California (http://www.loc.gov/rr/print/list/128_migm.html).  It has essentially become an icon of the Great Depression.  Lange’s work was to document the economic and social trials among the nation’s agricultural workers.

Dorothea Lange
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Lange_car.jpg

Thompson later regretted that she allowed Lange to take the photos.  While the photos became very popular, they did nothing to help Thompson out of the financial and social distress that she and her children were in (http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/awhhtml/awpnp6/migrant_mother.html).   The photograph kind of showed her as being vulnerable and helpless. Years later, Thompson’s daughter advised that her mother was actually a very strong woman and a leader, which is probably why she disliked the photo- it made her look overly vulnerable and she certainly wasn’t (http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/awhhtml/awpnp6/migrant_mother.html).

Florence Owens Thompson
http://loc.gov/pictures/resource/fsa.8b29516/


The “Migrant Mother” photographs had relevance back then, and it has relevance now.  When Lange approached and spoke to Thompson, Thompson explained her current living situation.  She explained that she was basically living on frozen vegetables from the surrounding fields, as well as birds that her children managed to kill.  She had sold the tires from her car to buy food (http://www.loc.gov/rr/print/list/128_migm.html).  What Thompson was going through back then isn’t too far off from what happens in society today.  How often do we walk down the street and see a homeless person asking for change?  Times have changed and we consider ourselves more advanced today than people may have been back in 1936.  But people still go through the same struggles.  People still suffer during economic downturns.  People still do whatever they physically can in order to make ends meet.  People will gladly give up their possessions just to ensure a meal.  The “Migrant Mother” photographs represent the idea that the more things change, the more they stay the same. 

Florence Owens Thompson and her children
 http://loc.gov/pictures/resource/ppmsca.03054/

Works Cited:

Tuesday, October 5, 2010

edited/altered images

It is no surprise that near every image you see in modern media has been altered or "touched up" in some way, shape, or form.  Today I altered and edited pictures from my own personal collection.  I specifically chose pictures that I actually love, just the way they are, but wanted to show how these pictures can be altered, emphasized, and de-emphasized in different ways.

The first set of pictures is of one of my heros- my father.  The original picture was taken by me when both my father and I went to Florida in December of 2008.  My father and I decided to go to the beach.  I am not the biggest fan of fishing, but I do love sitting and relaxing on the beach.  So, at this moment, we were both happy and relaxed.


Photobucket
Unedited


Photobucket
Edited
 The first picture is a picture I took of my father on the beach just as he threw his last catch back into the water and we were going to get ready to head back to the hotel.  I was sitting on a lawn chair and could barely see my father's face because of the strong light from the sun behind him.  He turned to look at me while resting his fishing rod on the ground and asked me if I was ready to go home.  I told him not to move as I scrambled for my camera and took this picture.

In the edited photo, I simply brightened the light from the sun in the background.  It just lights up the entire photo.  Also, in the first picture, you'll notice that my knee is showing in the bottom left corner of the picture, so I cropped my knee out so as not to take away from the majestic look of this picture. To me, this picture looks so regal.  My father looks like some sort of King in the sunset, and the fishing rod is his staff.  I just love it.



The next picture is a bit bizarre.  It was taken 3 winters ago in the evening.  A little known fact about me is that I have Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.  It is an autoimmune disease.  It affects my kidneys.  In 2004, I went into complete renal failure and have been on dialysis ever since.  In 2008, I learned how to operate a dialysis machine and therefore do dialysis myself at home.  Before that, I had to venture out at 6:30am every Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday morning to go to the hospital and receive dialysis.



It can get cold in the dialysis unit, so I always carry a duffle bag with a heavy blanket in it.  Early one morning, I put on my scarf and winter jacket and was ready to head off to dialysis.  I bent down and picked up my duffle bag so I could zip it up. It was sitting on the floor near the dining table.  Little did I know-when I zipped up my duffle bag, my scarf had gotten caught in the zipper of the bag.  When I dropped the duffle bag on the ground, my neck was jerked forward by the force of the bag due to my scarf being caught in the duffle bag.  Unlucky for me- the force of my face flying forward was halted by the corner of one of the dining room chairs.  I had smacked the corner of my eye on the corner of the chair.  The result was a black eye.

Photobucket
Unaltered


Photobucket
Altered
I took a picture of my eye after I had returned home from dialysis. How odd is it to describe such a story to others?  I wore a lot of concealer until the black eye faded.  In the altered photo, I used Picasa 3 to add "warmth" to the picture.  I also added tuning, adjusted the contrast, and added a bit of shadowing to the picture to try and camoflague the black eye slightly.  In looking at the altered photo, the result was almost a more pronounced black eye.

I kind of enjoy the original picture because I've never had a black eye, and because the way I got the black eye is so odd.

The last photo might be my favourite set of photos of all.  As I mentioned previously, I am on dialysis.  In order to facilitate the dialysis, I had to have a fistula put into my left arm.  A fistula is essentially when a vein in my arm and an artery are attached surgically, causing blood to flow through more rapidly.  It also causes the vein to get bigger, therefore making it easier to insert the relatively large needles into the vein without blowing it up.  I've always been self conscious about the appearance of my fistula.  It's big, it's weird, and it's ugly.  I usually avoid wearing short sleeved shirts, even on the hottest of days.  I usually wear cardigans or long sleeved shirts.

My friend Carmela is a photographer.  While we were in the park, she encouraged me to allow her to take a picture of me-fistula and all.  Again, I was aprehensive, but then thought that the final result might just come out beautifully.  So, I agreed.


Photobucket
Unaltered


Photobucket
Altered
I ended up loving the picture Carmela took.  After having this picture taken, I didn't feel like I always needed to hide my fistula.  I knew that people might stare, or ask questions, but aside from that, what's the worst that could happen?

In my edited photo, I decided to make the fistula the focal point of the picture.  I made the entire photo black and white, except for the fistula.  The reason I did this was to show that I am no longer afraid to show my fistula or to have people see it.  It is a part of me, and it is my lifeline.  Why should I be ashamed of it?


-all photos were edited using Picasa 3.
``

Saturday, September 25, 2010

can art be mechanically reproduced?

When something is reproduced so many times, I feel that it definitely loses its artistic elements.  When something is created by an artist, it has uniqueness and rareness to it.  The artist that initially produced that particular piece of art put their strengths, talent, and feelings into that piece. 
Consider The Last Supper by Leonardo da Vinci.  A quick search on the internet shows how frequently this piece has been reproduced.

The first two representations of Leonardo da Vinci's last supper seem to be "close" to originals, but you can also see how the colour in the image is brightened.  The third image is obviously a blatent reproduction of the original:




http://www.knowledgerush.com/kr/encyclopedia/The_Last_Supper_(Leonardo)




http://www.thebricktestament.com/latest_additions/archive_2007.html
 



Once it is reproduced over and over again, those intimate feelings are lost.  At times, however, the reproducibility of art can be important.  If art was never reproduced, the people of today may not have had the chance to witness such beautiful creations, even if it was a reproduction.  No doubt, some of the unique elements of the piece will be lost in a reproduction.  However, a reproduction can still give people of today a taste of the work of talents of the past.  That said, when a piece of art is mechanically reproduced over and over again, society loses the true essence of that piece of art was meant to symbolize. 

In my opinion, photography IS art.  It is meant to express something.  It is meant to capture something.  It is meant to show the viewer of the photograph something through the eyes of the photographer.  How can one view the following photograph of model/acress Lily Cole taken by photographer Sølve Sundsbø and not consider it art?


One of Henry Peach Robinson's most famous pieces was Fading away, created in 1858.  It was composed of five negatives which shows a girl dying from tuberculousis, and her family around her.  People were not used to this type of imagery being in a photograph; people were used to seeing such images in paintings.  Perhaps Hentry Peach Robinson was trying to break down walls and show that photographs "were allowed" to have such imagery in it as well.



Digitalization has made photography much more accessible to a wider range of people.  It allows one to immediately view a photograph after it has been taken as opposed to having to wait for the developing process to take place first.  It allows even the most novice user access to taking a decent photo.  Photography has continued to advance over the years and I am sure that there is much more advancement to be seen in the future where photography is concerned.








Monday, September 20, 2010

early days of photography & portraits of today

Photography in the early days and portraits of today varied in many ways.  The first of many ways in which photography differed is in the technical process itself.  In the 1850s, there were two main methods of photography that were used for different reasons.  One method was used primarily for studio typed portraits, while the other method of photography was primarily used for outdoor photography.  


The processes used to create photography were also quite complex and varied, depending on the clarity/detail desired.  A few examples of this include calotype, which was used due to its inexpensive, light, and robust properties.  The Le Gray method was used to achieve a more transparent texture, resulting in a glass-like finish.


Portraits of the past were, at first, reserved for those of high status.  Clientele such as doctors, lawyers, politicians, and other people with a great deal of money were able to get their portrait taken.  With the initiation of a standardization process of the photo-taking processes, the cost of such photos decreased greatly.  This enabled those who perhaps did not have as many financial resources to also have their photos taken.


Today, photos and portraits are much more affordable than they were in the past.  In fact, with the rise in popularity of digital cameras, the ability to purchase a camera and take pictures on one’s own is an alternative to getting a professional photograph or portrait taken.  That said, the cost of having professional portraits taken can often still be pricey.  According to professional photographer Karolin Balash’s website, the cost of, for example, baby portraits has a cost of $800. (http://www.karolinbalash.com) Similar to portraits of the past, the photographer has to consider their expertise, equipment, assistants, and professional equipment to be used during the photo session when establishing their costs.


Photographers of today also have access to plenty of photo editing software that can be used to enhance and perfect photos that have been taken, whereas that luxury did not exist for photos of the past.


In the photograph below, you will see a portrait taken by Matthew Brady (May 18, 1822-Jan 15-1896). (http://www.mathewbrady.com/)  Matthew Brady was a photographer who was famous for his pictures of celebrities as well as his documentation of the American Civil War. It was his photos of Abraham Lincoln that were used on the $5 dollar bill as well as the Lincoln Penny. 



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Abraham_Lincoln_1860.jpg  

In these times, portraits seem to simply depict the subject and did not seem to have the specific goal of being provocative or “eye-catching”.


Compare this to a portrait taken of now President Barack Obama which appeared on the cover of the March 2009 issue of Vanity Fair taken by Annie Leibovitz.



http://www.glamourvanity.com/celebrities/barack-obama-covers-vanity-fair/ 

This portrait, while also of a president, is in stark contract to the picture taken of Abraham Lincoln several years prior.  The photo of Abraham Lincoln has the president standing, looking very authoritative, serious,  and “in control”.  While Barack Obama is, as president, all of these things, he appears more approachable in this portrait.  He is seated, without a jacket, and appears to be more relaxed.


This photo is also a testament to the advanced technology available in more recent times.  This portrait taken by Annie Leibovitz is actually a photograph taken for the July 2007 issue of Vanity Fair, even before Barack Obama was president.  In addition to that, this photo also had actor Don Cheadle in it.  For the March 2009 Vanity Fair Cover, the background colour was changed and Don Cheadle was completely cropped out of the picture.  



http://www.observer.com/2009/media/so-much-change-vanity-fair-uses-2007-obama-cover-march-2009-issue


On a side note, I also found the following picture interesting in that it depicts both Barack Obama and Abraham Lincoln in the same shot.  I am yet to determine whether or not Matthew Brady was the person who shot either of these particular portraits of President Lincoln as well!




http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2009/10/barack-obama-annie-leibovitz.html






Sources:

A History of Photography


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Abraham_Lincoln_1860.jpg


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathew_Brady


http://www.glamourvanity.com/celebrities/barack-obama-covers-vanity-fair/


http://www.karolinbalash.com


http://www.observer.com/2009/media/so-much-change-vanity-fair-uses-2007-obama-cover-march-2009-issue


http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2009/10/barack-obama-annie-leibovitz.html

 

Friday, September 10, 2010

Florence..who?


Hello Everyone,

My name is Florence Tewogbade and I'm in my 5th semester of Business Administration-Human Resources.  Upon graduation, I hope to get into the field of recruiting.

My hobbies include volunteering, baking/cake decorating, and travelling. 

I'm pretty happy to take this course as it is outside of the HR realm that I have been used to for the past few semesters.  It's always nice to delve into something different and new.  I look forward to learning and participating.